Betting On South Carolina

Legalize gambling in South Carolina. And by gambling, I mean casinos, slot machines and parimutuel betting.

South Carolina already has scratch-off games, so let’s not argue that there is some high and noble reason to deny the idea of gambling.

The usual “oh, but people will abuse it – they’ll leave their kids in hot cars while playing slots – they’ll lose their mortgage payments – woe, woe, woe,” won’t wash either. People will – and DO – abuse pretty much ANYthing.

They abuse alcohol and it’s legal. They abuse marriage vows, automobiles, fast food, slow food, ALL food, religion, people, highways, tobacco, free speech, money, caffeine, sugar, Wal-Mart, television, language, the internet (some will say I’m doing THAT right now), animals, prescription drugs, the confidence placed in them by the voting public … Probably every legal activity and thing is abused. Folks will consume beyond moderation which lead to consequences to themselves and others.

Should EVERYthing be banned because SOME will pervert? I love cheeseburgers, but some people shouldn’t eat them for health reasons. Should I be denied a thick, juicy patty with tomatoes, pickles, spicy mustard and ketchup on a toasted sesame seed bun because some guy with high cholesterol will leave his kid in a hot car while he chomps down on a Hardee’s Black Angus Thickburger with cheese?

Put down that beer! Somebody can’t hold their booze so YOU can’t wash down your pulled pork sandwich with your choice of brew. Oh, and you can’t have a pulled pork sandwich because some religions think it’s devil meat.

As for those of faith who believe there is a moral repugnance to gambling, I’m sure I won’t convince them otherwise. But it’s not the job of government to legislate morality. Besides, I’ve not been able to find biblical denunciations of gambling. Yes, there are admonitions about “love of money,” and Proverbs says “Dishonest money dwindles away, but he who gathers money little by little makes it grow.”

Love of money” could be interpreted as to negate such activities as working for promotions (which mean more money), changing jobs (for more money), getting an education (for more money), participation in the stock market (where most retirement funds are invested), real estate speculation/investment and more – like taxation. As for Proverbs, gambling – regulated gambling – isn’t “dishonest money.” And when someone was “casting lots,” it was for the purposes of making decisions, not shooting craps.

As long as we’re on the issue of religion and dishonest money, since some preachers and tele-evangelists have defrauded their respective flocks of millions of dollars over the years, should there be an argument for banning or regulating offerings in church services? Or rather, since SOME have abused the practice, should ALL be denied?

And of course, there are those fanatics that deny their children medical care for religious reasons. Which then, should be denied – the zealots or medicine?

I’m all for preserving sweet traditions, “family values” and those social interactions of more innocent times. But South Carolina’s archaic laws and sensibilities are denying progress and, with it, opportunities and necessary services for the population. Right now, churches, CHURCHES can’t even have an simple raffle because it’s considered “gambling!” No matter that a church may need money to repair a roof or help maintain or even establish a soup kitchen. Can’t have a raffle because someone might leave their child in a hot car while buying a raffle ticket.

As for the more unsavory ancillary activities that are often associated with gambling (drugs, prostitution, loan sharking, gaudy shows and watered down liquor), it’s not like South Carolina – or any other state – is without them now. And gambling addiction? Yep. It’ll happen. But, as with abuse, one man’s addiction is another man’s recreation. If only those things that AREN’T addictive were legalized, we would be Amish. By the way, some people have a sex addiction. All those in favor of the government not allowing THAT, raise your hand. Uh huh…. thought so.

Gambling is lucrative commerce for state and local governments and profit monsters for many businesses and industries. Without even counting the current economic distress, South Carolina is desperate for revenue – not just the state, but businesses and individuals.  For the state, there are revenues from ticket sales (often, half of the ticket sales go into state coffers and the other half makes up the “jackpots”) and winnings are – say it with me – taxed.  As many have pointed out, gambling is voluntary taxation.  And arguing about not wanting to make money off of misery or sin won’t work either.  South Carolina, like EVERY state, rakes in muli-millions of dollars from the sale of alcohol and tobacco.  So be careful in your righteousness.

Maryland paid out more than $1 billion in prizes last year just from Keno, scratch-offs, state and multi-state lotteries and parimutuel betting. Over $493 million was deposited into Maryland’s State General Fund. This without slots and casinos.  The opportunities for South Carolina are substantial. The first is the licensing of casinos in major tourist locations. Slot parlors could be established almost anywhere (within reason) and with a rich horse tradition in the state, equestrian racing and even dog racing (with strict regulations on treatment during and after the dogs’ “careers”) could also be offered (Camden, Aiken and Charleston).

Follow that with the accompanying businesses and industries that spring up to support or otherwise benefit from the gambling community and there is a huge source of revenue available.

As long as bordering states continue to restrict gambling, the out-of-state customer potential is huge. Throw in the non-gambling business that will benefit (gas stations, hotels, eateries, shops, automobile rental, recreation, etc.), and the state treasury gets more and more gilded.

Naturally, strict regulation would be necessary to protect the gambling public. The industry, the establishment owners and the customers would need and demand it. And there are plenty of resources and historical precedents around the country available for the state to research and sound and effective policies it can implement.

Will there be downsides? Yep. Every new venture has them as does doing nothing. But isn’t record unemployment a downside? Isn’t one of the nation’s poorest performing school systems a downside? Isn’t a mid-20th century business environment a downside?

I’m gonna get a cheeseburger. You can bet on it.



9 thoughts on “Betting On South Carolina

  1. I want all businesses to come here, the formula is pure and simple – reduction in taxes,
    reduction in regulations and right to work laws. Google “Milton Friedman and Spartanburg SC”.
    I want no gilded coffers for the state government (this appeals to the wrong mentality).
    Either we want business or we don’t. The Mob – well if they own the casinos, I guess they have a right to protect them. Since the pols wouldn’t have anything to gain, why should
    we worry about corruption?



  2. I couldn’t agree with you more. I’ve believed for a long time that SC needs legalized gambling. what a boom for SC economy that would be. I’ve also said, by my being in favor of gambling, it was my evil liberal twin coming out in me. 🙂 – so be it…It would be good for SC!!


  3. Nope, no way not while I breath (I hope).

    Here’s your biblical admonition:

    1 Timothy 6:10-11
    For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs. But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness.

    Here’s your logical arguement:

    Everywhere that gambling has been legalized, organized crime has followed.

    We have enough problems in South Carolina. The lottery has not been the promised panacea, Please, let’s don’t invite more.

    Out of curiosity, isn’t this Ford’s entire platform, why didn’t you come out supporting him?


    • Ah, but Colonel… you didn’t read my post sufficiently. If one applies 1 Timothy completely, then one would never do ANYthing for additional money; not seek promotion or sell anything for profit. Should pro-athletes not seek bigger contracts, even though a team is willing to pay? And even though celebrities make a ton of money, should they turn down an endorsement deal for another ton of money? Move your money to a stock that pays a better dividend? Nope. Not according to 1st Timothy.

      Oh, and should we not demand lower taxes because, after all, it puts money into our pockets and, to pay less to the government would not be “ender(ing) unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s.” [Matthew 22:15-22]

      And be careful in quoting Timothy; Ever give your wife/girlfriend/mother/daughter jewelry?

      1 Timothy 2:9: In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

      As for organized crime, who do you think is already selling drugs in SC or smuggling people and cigarettes? And if you don’t think organized crime can’t be found on the shipping docks on the coast, you’re naive.

      And no, the lottery hasn’t been the “promised panacea” because it has been far too restricted and it’s run by the government. I proprose private industry casinos, not government-run scratch offs and “education” lotteries.


  4. I read it, I just disagree with your interpretation. Paul was warning against austentacious display in 1Tim 2:9.

    Based on my understanding of the Bible, God has no problem with riches or wealth. Just huge problems with the lengths we sometimes go to, to obtain them. In fact, Jesus remarks on the benefit of doing well in the parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-30). The servants who had done the right thing by earning their master more money are rewarded.
    Consider Job: (Job 1:1-3) In the land of Uz there lived a man whose name was Job. This man was blameless and upright; he feared God and shunned evil. 2 He had seven sons and three daughters, 3 and he owned seven thousand sheep, three thousand camels, five hundred yoke of oxen and five hundred donkeys, and had a large number of servants. He was the greatest man among all the people of the East.
    You’ll not convince me or any other serious scholar that the Bible preaches poverty – it does however teach a day’s work for a day’s wage, good stewardship and consideration for your fellow man – the moral risk of gambling is that there is the potential of something for nothing that many can’t resist to their own ultimate financial ruin.

    To the crime argument, yes, we’ve got drugs dealers and organized crime all over our fair state – why invite more? I’m hoping that when my friend Jim Matthews gets elected sheriff in Kershaw county and demonstrates for the rest of the state what a serious approach to combating drugs and gangs can accomplish that maybe we’ll get serious state wide.

    Naïve – hardly, you know better, we learned our pragmatism in the same place.


  5. Garnet Spy:

    I’ll trade you: we outlaw government run gambling in exchange for private enterprise gambling establishments.

    Or, to be more specific, and to promote consent of the government, the state should by Constitutional Amendment forbid the practice of state run vices and allow counties to permit or not permit–as they see fit at the local levels–to have gambling of whatever sort they want that would be regulated by a state agency responsible for making sure machines and practices fall within certain standards set by state law.

    I’d love to see horse racing type gambling–don’t care much for dog racing, however. And I don’t like the slot machines–would prefer to see table style gambling but, whatever floats one’s boat, I suppose if it is something the community wants to allow.

    If certain counties do not want to put up with associated vices they think come with the gambling industry, they should, by all means, be able to outlaw it.


  6. Some slow Sunday afternoon, drive down Devine towards Fort Jackson from 5 Points, near the Lutheran Church on the left, you’ll see a marker denoting the spot where a race track once stood. Gambling on the horse races (and cock fights) was a favorite past time there. As I recall, it belonged to Wade Hampton.

    The reason it is no more is that we collectively realized that “…the human cost exceeds the human value…” quoting someone much wiser than I.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s