Courting Danger

Justice John Paul Stevens, a 34-year liberal veteran, leaves the Supreme Court this week, likely to be replaced by current Solicitor General Elena Kagan.  Last September, Kagan presented the Obama Administration’s argument in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission before the Supreme Court.

The case involves the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, a 2002 statute passed by Congress to limit election-related communications, especially so-called “attack ads.” 

At issue in the case is a film, “Hillary: The Movie,” that was produced by the conservative advocacy group Citizens United, which portrayed then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in an unfavorable light.  The feature-length movie was released in theaters and has become available on DVD.  Citizens United also had plans to advertise the movie during the presidential campaign season, and to make it available via on-demand cable services before the election.  Although the film does not expressly advocate for or against Clinton’s candidacy, the Washington, D.C. District Court held that it was clearly intended to urge viewers to vote against Clinton, and that the promotional ads for the movie would therefore have to follow the same disclosure and disclaimer requirements as political ads. [Harvard Law School]

Kagan argued  “that the lower court’s decision to restrict Citizens United was proper, and that Congress has the authority to restrain corporate spending on communications that are plainly oriented towards supporting or advocating against a particular political candidate.”

When questioned by the justices about the potential expansion of such restrictions on communications, Kagan stated that Federal Election Commission statutes prohibiting publication of certain books would be acceptable because “in 60 years, the FEC has never applied [these] statutes to a book.”  In other words, it’s OK to ban books because bureaucrats haven’t enforced similar laws in the past and aren’t likely to in the future.

Chief Justice John Roberts delightfully responded, “We don’t put our First Amendment rights in the hands of FEC bureaucrats.”

Then, Justice Anthony Kennedy: “So you’re a lawyer advising somebody about to come out with a book and you say don’t worry, the FEC has never tried to send somebody to prison for this.  This statute covers this, but don’t worry, the FEC has never done it.  Is that gonna comfort your client?  I don’t think so.”

And that grinds these issues to bare metal.  What is it, in Constitutional challenges, legislation or presidential directives that the Obama Administration is trying to do?  What laws and legal precedents are being burrowed into our legislative and judicial innards? 

It is easily argued that the Obama Administration, including its designated saboteurs in the Senate and House of Representatives are systematically and systemically eroding basic tenants of our republic.  His appointments to the Supreme Court will be lifetime “judicial czars” for a socialist reformation.  From forcing citizens to buy government health insurance to neglecting border incursions, restricting free speech, dismantling the free market system and exponentially expanding government intrusion at the expense of personal liberties, Barack Obama is making King George look like John Adams.

Our democracy is a strong institution, but it is decidedly fragile when attacked from within.  There is a slow but steady and headstrong coup d’etat underway in the United States.  We, the electorate, have given these subversives access to our greatest national treasure and they are destroying that treasure with impunity. 

The last battle space for retaining our fundamental freedoms is the Supreme Court.  Denying extremist constitutional revisionists access to the grand bench is vital to that preservation.

We are still masters of our fate. We are still captain of our souls,”  said Winston Churchill.



5 thoughts on “Courting Danger

  1. I still maintain that the STATES are the last field of battle for our inalienable rights. Until we make it clear that We, the People as organized within our states will stand up to the central government (which by definition includes the US Supreme Court), they will continue to run roughshod on us as the Supreme Court makes excuses, for the most part, for the dictatorial powers.


  2. you had better start standing up for your fellow citizens then. this state refuses to enforce hand picked laws, and goes hog wild enforcing other rules and laws.

    nothing applies to the elected elite. everything applies to the ” small man” as BP so adeptly put it.

    Kagan will weaken the country no doubt about it. She probably has her own agenda.

    Don’t they all?????????????


  3. In regards to Working Tommy, it doesn’t help that our chief State defender goes running off to Argentina. And then there is the great LINSEY GRAHAM yaah ! He is probably going to vote for Kagin. I campaigned for Witherspoon, not a awesome candidate,but a lot better than what we got. I then voted for Linsey, my reasoning was for the sake of the Supreme Court nominees. I want a refund.


  4. Jake and the commies?


    Somebody looking a lot like Jake Knotts driving
    a large car backed over two men wearing Mao
    suits, crushing both. They literally greased his
    tires as he sped away. The driver didn’t seem
    aware of what he had just done.
    Thirteen witnesses, also wearing Mao suits
    and carrying political signs, saw the man as he
    exited a local bar. They said he was wearing a
    colorful shirt, knee shorts and white shoes.
    He came to a full stop at the next stop sign,
    turned right and drove away.
    Friends of Jake said he had been with them all
    afternoon at a backyard barbecue.
    The witnesses, who didn’t seem to realize the
    ordinary dangers posed by all the hustle and
    bustle of Lexington were told to stand on the
    porch of a nearby house until they could be
    taken to a quieter location.
    Jake is no longer a suspect.


  5. Eggaday:

    I agree and I do. I am not part of the elite. I have no moral choice but to stand up for common working folks.


    You should have voted for Conley. He is rock solid in terms of the Constitution and states’ rights. I did volunteer work for Witherspoon and then for Conley.

    I am NOT comparing Graham’s opponents to the devil but I would even have voted for Lucifer Satan over Lindsey Graham.

    We may have a great candidate for taking Lindsey down in 2014. We’ll see what happens.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s